SF QuorumQuorum
Back to legislation
Hearing#210702Pending Committee Action
In plain English

This hearing will discuss the findings of the 2020-2021 Civil Grand Jury Report regarding issues related to Van Ness Avenue. The report examines underlying problems and potential improvements for the area.

Hearing on the 2020-2021 Civil Grand Jury Report, entitled "Van Ness Avenue: What Lies Beneath."

Introduced: Jun 28, 2021
Final action: โ€”
Official record โ†—

How it got here

The legislation originated from the findings of the 2020-2021 Civil Grand Jury Report on the Van Ness Improvement Project, which highlighted significant project delays and cost overruns due to inadequate planning and management.

1
Approval of Proposition K2003-11-04
San Francisco Voters

Voters approved Proposition K, a sales tax to fund rapid transit service on Van Ness Avenue, which set the stage for the Van Ness Improvement Project.

2020-2021 CGJ Rpt 062821
2
Approval of Van Ness Bus Rapid Transit Project2013-09-01
San Francisco Board of Supervisors

The Board of Supervisors approved the Van Ness Bus Rapid Transit Project, which became the core of the Van Ness Improvement Project.

2020-2021 CGJ Rpt 062821
3
Construction Begins2016-10-01
San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency (SFMTA)

Construction on the Van Ness Improvement Project began, with an initial completion date set for late 2019.

2020-2021 CGJ Rpt 062821
4
Release of Grand Jury Report2021-06-28
San Francisco Civil Grand Jury

The Civil Grand Jury released its report titled 'Van Ness Avenue: What Lies Beneath,' identifying major issues with project management and planning that led to delays and cost overruns.

2020-2021 CGJ Rpt 062821
5
Adoption of Resolution 496-212021-10-29
San Francisco Board of Supervisors

The Board of Supervisors adopted Resolution 496-21 in response to the Grand Jury's findings, directing city departments to implement recommendations for improving project management.

COB Ltr 111021
6
Response Received2022-07-06
Clerk of the Board

The Clerk of the Board received responses from various city departments regarding the Grand Jury's recommendations, indicating ongoing discussions about implementation.

Action history
7
Report on Policy Options2022-03-31
Budget and Legislative Analyst

The Budget and Legislative Analyst issued a report analyzing options for adopting a policy regarding itemized assessments of de-risking activities for major capital projects, prompted by the Grand Jury's findings.

BLA Rpt 033122

Reconstructed from attached documents & the official record

Document trail
PDF โ†—
PDF โ†—
PDF โ†—
PDF โ†—
PDF โ†—
SFMTA Board Response 082721
SF Municipal Transportation Agency
PDF โ†—
PDF โ†—
PDF โ†—
PDF โ†—
PDF โ†—
SFMTA Presentation 093021
SF Municipal Transportation Agency
PDF โ†—
PDF โ†—
PDF โ†—
SFMTA Response 070622
SF Municipal Transportation Agency
PDF โ†—
BLA Rpt 033122
Budget and Legislative Analyst
PDF โ†—
BLA Rpt 033122 (2)
Budget and Legislative Analyst
PDF โ†—

How they voted

CONTINUED TO CALL OF THE CHAIR
Government Audit and Oversight Committee ยท Oct 7, 2021Pass
2-0
CONTINUED
Government Audit and Oversight Committee ยท Sep 30, 2021Pass
2-0

Legislative journey

PresidentJun 28, 2021
โ†’RECEIVED AND ASSIGNED
Clerk of the BoardAug 27, 2021
ยทRESPONSE RECEIVED
Government Audit and Oversight CommitteeSep 30, 2021 โ€“ Oct 7, 2021
โ†ทCONTINUEDPass
โ†ทCONTINUED TO CALL OF THE CHAIRPass
Clerk of the BoardJul 6, 2022
ยทRESPONSE RECEIVED