SF QuorumQuorum
Back to legislation
Motion#211112Passed
In plain English

The motion endorses a settlement of a lawsuit against major distributors of prescription opioids, which the City and County of San Francisco filed. It also schedules a public hearing and a closed session for the Board of Supervisors to discuss the litigation with the City Attorney.

Motion calling from the Government Audit and Oversight Committee, pursuant to Board Rule 3.37, the proposed Ordinance (File No. 211071) endorsing settlement of the lawsuit filed on behalf of the City and County of San Francisco and the People of the State of California against large distributors of prescription opioids, entitled The City and County of San Francisco and the People of the State of California v. Purdue Pharma L.P., Richard S. Sackler, Jonathan D. Sackler, Mortimer D.A. Sackler, Kathe A. Sackler, Ilene Sackler Lefcourt, Beverly Sackler, Theresa Sackler, David A. Sackler, Trust for the Benefit of Members of the Raymond Sackler Family, Rhodes Pharmaceuticals L.P., Cephalon, Inc., Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Endo International Plc, Endo Health Solutions Inc., Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc., Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Insys Therapeutics, Inc., Mallinckrodt Plc, Mallinckrodt LLC, Allergan Plc F/K/A Actavis Plc, Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc. N/K/A Actavis, Inc., Watson Laboratories, Inc., Actavis LLC, Actavis Pharma, Inc. F/K/A/ Watson Pharma, Inc., AmerisourceBergen Corporation, Cardinal Health, Inc., and McKesson Corporation; scheduling the Board of Supervisors to sit as a Committee of the Whole at the meeting on November 2, 2021, at 3:00 p.m. to hold a public hearing to consider the proposed Ordinance; and scheduling a closed session of the Board of Supervisors at the same meeting for the purpose of conferring with, or receiving advice from, the City Attorney regarding that existing litigation in which the City is a plaintiff, pursuant to California Government Code, Section 54956.9(a), and San Francisco Administrative Code, Section 67.10(d)(1).

Introduced: Oct 19, 2021
Final action: Oct 26, 2021
Official record โ†—

How it got here

This legislation originated from a lawsuit settlement regarding opioid distributors, prompted by the ongoing opioid crisis in San Francisco.

1
Lawsuit FiledDecember 2018
City and County of San Francisco

The City filed a lawsuit against several large distributors of prescription opioids, alleging they created a public nuisance and violated various laws by distributing excessive volumes of opioids despite knowledge of the epidemic.

Leg Final
2
Committee ReviewOctober 2021
Government Audit and Oversight Committee

The proposed Ordinance endorsing the settlement of the lawsuit was reviewed by the Government Audit and Oversight Committee before being called to the Board of Supervisors.

Leg Final
3
Motion ApprovedOctober 26, 2021
Board of Supervisors

The Board of Supervisors approved the motion to endorse the settlement, allowing the City to receive between $27 million to $50 million from the opioid distributors.

Leg Final
4
Public Hearing and Closed SessionNovember 2, 2021
Board of Supervisors

The Board convened as a Committee of the Whole to hold a public hearing and a closed session to confer with the City Attorney regarding the existing litigation.

Leg Final

Reconstructed from attached documents & the official record

Document trail
PDF โ†—
PDF โ†—
PDF โ†—

How they voted

APPROVED
Board of Supervisors ยท Oct 26, 2021Pass
4-0

Legislative journey

PresidentOct 19, 2021
โœ“REFERRED FOR ADOPTION WITHOUT COMMITTEE REFERENCE AGENDA AT THE NEXT BOARD MEETING
Board of SupervisorsOct 26, 2021
โœ“APPROVEDPass