SF QuorumQuorum
Back to legislation
Ordinance#260926Pending Committee Action
In plain English

The ordinance authorizes a settlement of a lawsuit where Genasci Dairy and associated parties will pay $400,000 to the City for alleged violations of public utility laws and damage to public infrastructure. This settlement is currently pending committee action.

Ordinance authorizing settlement of the lawsuit filed by the City and County of San Francisco against Genasci Dairy, Inc.; William Genasci and Susan A. Genasci, Trustees of the W&S Genasci Revocable Trust; Della May Genasci, Successor Trustee of the Edwin J. Genasci Trust; and July Walther, Successor Trustee of the Verena R. Walther 1998 Trust Agreement, for a $400,000 payment to the City; the lawsuit was filed on July 31, 2024, in Stanislaus County Superior Court, Case No. CV-24-006043, entitled City and County of San Francisco v. Genasci Dairy, Inc. et al.; the lawsuit involves alleged violations of Public Utilities Code, Section 10251 and damage to public infrastructure.

Introduced: Sep 1, 2026
Final action: Sep 1, 2026
Official record โ†—

How it got here

This legislation originated from a lawsuit settlement involving alleged violations of public utilities law and damage to infrastructure.

1
Lawsuit FiledJuly 31, 2024
City and County of San Francisco

The City filed a lawsuit against Genasci Dairy, Inc. and associated parties in Stanislaus County Superior Court for alleged violations of Public Utilities Code, Section 10251, and damage to public infrastructure.

Leg Ver1
2
Settlement RecommendationMarch 2026
San Francisco Public Utilities Commission

The San Francisco Public Utilities Commission recommended settling the lawsuit for a payment of $400,000 to the City.

Leg Ver1
3
Ordinance DraftedMarch 2026
City Attorney

The City Attorney drafted an ordinance to authorize the settlement of the lawsuit, which was approved as to form and recommended by the City Attorney's office.

Leg Ver1
4
Received from DepartmentJuly 30, 2026
Clerk of the Board

The ordinance was received from the City Attorney's office by the Clerk of the Board.

Action history
5
Assigned for Committee ActionSeptember 1, 2026
President of the Board

The ordinance was received and assigned to a committee for further action by the President of the Board.

Action history

Reconstructed from attached documents & the official record

Document trail
PDF โ†—

How they voted

No recorded roll-call vote yet. This item may have passed without a recorded individual vote, or is still pending.

Legislative journey

Clerk of the BoardJul 30, 2026
ยทRECEIVED FROM DEPARTMENT
PresidentSep 1, 2026
โ†’RECEIVED AND ASSIGNED