Legislation

This legislation changes the term limits for the Mayor and Members of the Board of Supervisors from two consecutive terms to lifetime limits. It will be voted on in an election scheduled for June 2, 2026.

Charter Amendment (First Draft) to amend the Charter of the City and County of San Francisco to change the current two-term limits for the office of Mayor and the office of Member of the Board of Supervisors from consecutive term limits to lifetime term limits; at an election to be held on June 2, 2026.

The resolution supports Senate Bill No. 3464, known as the “Housing BOOM Act,” which aims to boost federal investment and incentives for housing production to tackle the housing affordability crisis. It also endorses a companion bill to be introduced by U.S. Representative Lateefah Simon.

Resolution supporting the passage of Senate Bill No. 3464, the “Housing BOOM (Building Occupancy Opportunities for Millions)” Act, authored and introduced by United States (U.S) Senator Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), and a companion bill that will be authored and introduced by U.S. Representative Lateefah Simon (D-Calif-12), to increase federal investment and expand incentives to encourage housing production and help address root causes of the housing affordability crisis.

The ordinance authorizes the City and County of San Francisco to settle a lawsuit for up to $20 million related to an employment dispute filed by Devon Anderson and Beverly L. Sweeney on behalf of current and former employees. The lawsuit was initiated in February 2020 in federal court.

Ordinance authorizing settlement of the lawsuit filed by Devon Anderson, Beverly L. Sweeney on behalf of themselves and all other similarly situated current and former employees against the City and County of San Francisco for up to $20,000,000; the lawsuit was filed on February 13, 2020, in United States District Court for the Northern District of California, Case No. 20-cv-01149-DMR; entitled Devon Anderson and Beverly L. Sweeney, et al. v. The City and County of San Francisco, et al.; the lawsuit involves an employment dispute.

The ordinance allows the City to waive certain housing fees and requirements for residential and neighborhood commercial projects outside specific areas if the developer agrees to rent control for all units. It also permits these projects to meet inclusionary housing requirements by dedicating land to the City and mandates periodic reports to the Planning Commission.

Ordinance amending the Planning Code to allow the City to waive the Inclusionary Housing Fee and other requirements in certain residential and neighborhood commercial districts outside of the Priority Equity Geographies Special Use District (SUD) in exchange for a project sponsor’s agreement to subject all units in the project to rent control; and allow projects in certain residential and neighborhood commercial districts outside of the Priority Equity Geographies SUD to comply with the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance by dedicating land to the City; requiring periodic reports to the Planning Commission; affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act; making findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code Section, 101.1; and making public necessity, convenience, and welfare findings under Planning Code, Section 302.

This resolution extends a grant agreement with Catholic Charities for homelessness prevention services by 30 months and increases the funding by over $8.6 million, totaling nearly $18.5 million. It also allows the Department of Homelessness and Supportive Housing to make minor adjustments to the agreement as needed.

Resolution approving the third amendment to the grant agreement between City, acting by and through the Department of Homelessness and Supportive Housing (“HSH”), and Catholic Charities for Family Eviction Prevention Collaborative (“FEPCO”) Homelessness Prevention, extending the term by 30 months from December 31, 2025, for a total term of July 1, 2021, through June 30, 2028; increasing the agreement amount by $8,672,460 for a total amount not to exceed $18,459,066; and authorizing HSH to enter into any amendments or other modifications to the amendment that do not materially increase the obligations or liabilities, or materially decrease the benefits to the City and are necessary or advisable to effectuate the purposes of the agreement.

The resolution extends La Cocina, Inc.'s lease of City-owned property at 101 Hyde Street for an additional five years, maintaining the annual rent at $12,000. It also allows the Director of Property to make minor amendments to the lease as needed without increasing the City's obligations.

Resolution authorizing the Director of Property to execute a Second Amendment to a Lease between the City and La Cocina, Inc. related to the lease of City-owned property located at 101 Hyde Street to extend the lease for an additional five years, from January 1, 2027, for a total term of July 9, 2019, through December 31, 2031, with no change to the annual base rent of $12,000; make certain modifications to the Second Amendment to Lease and take certain actions in furtherance of this Resolution, as defined herein; and to authorize the Director of Property to enter into amendments or modifications to the lease that do not materially increase the obligations or liabilities to the City and are necessary to effectuate the purposes of the lease or this Resolution.

This resolution allows the Department of Public Health to accept and use a $626,000 grant from the California Department of Health Care Services for a program aimed at addressing housing and homelessness from July 1, 2024, to June 30, 2026. It has been approved retroactively.

Resolution retroactively authorizing the Department of Public Health to accept and expend a grant from the California Department of Health Care Services through Blue Cross of California Partnership Plan, Inc. (Anthem) for participation in a program, entitled, “Housing and Homelessness Incentive Program,” in the amount of $626,000 for the period of July 1, 2024, through June 30, 2026.

This resolution allows the Department of Public Health to accept and use an additional $2,518,000 grant from the California Department of Health Care Services for a program aimed at addressing housing and homelessness. The total funding for the program will be $7,658,684.63 from July 1, 2023, to November 1, 2026.

Resolution retroactively authorizing the Department of Public Health to accept and expend a grant increase from the California Department of Health Care Services through San Francisco Health Plan for participation in a program, entitled, “Housing and Homelessness Incentive Program,” in the amount of $2,518,000 for the period of January 1, 2025, through November 1, 2026, for a total amount of $7,658,684.63 for the total period of July 1, 2023, through November 1, 2026; and approving the Notice of Award agreement pursuant to Charter, Section 9.118(a).

This resolution allows specific city officials to seek donations for the India Basin Waterfront Park Initiative from various organizations for six months. It overrides the Behested Payment Ordinance to facilitate this fundraising effort.

Resolution authorizing the Mayor, the Mayor's Chief of Staff, Chief of Infrastructure, Assistant Chief of Infrastructure, Chief of Housing and Economic Development, Director of Public Affairs, and Policy Advisor, and the General Manager of the Recreation and Park Department (RPD), the Director and staff of RPD's Partnership Division, RPD's Director of Capital and Planning, RPD's India Basin Project Manager, and RPD's India Basin Equitable Development Plan Manager to solicit donations for the India Basin Waterfront Park Initiative from nonprofits, private organizations, grantmakers, and foundations for six months, effective upon approval of this Resolution, notwithstanding the Behested Payment Ordinance.

This ordinance expands the hours restriction on retail food and tobacco establishments in the Tenderloin and South of Market neighborhoods, prohibiting them from opening between 12:00 a.m. and 5:00 a.m., or 2:00 a.m. to 5:00 a.m. for those regulated by alcohol laws. It also extends the pilot program's duration by 18 months beyond its original July 2026 expiration date.

Ordinance amending the Police Code to expand the current Tenderloin retail hours restriction pilot program, under which retail food and tobacco establishments in the restricted area are prohibited from being open to the public from 12:00 a.m. to 5:00 a.m., or from 2:00 a.m. to 5:00 a.m. if subject to regulation by the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control, to encompass a high-crime area across the Tenderloin and South of Market neighborhoods; and to extend the duration of the pilot program, currently set to expire in July 2026, to instead expire 18 months from the effective date of this Ordinance.

Proposes a change to city law: Changing the the city's zoning/building rules to exempt 100% affordable housing developments from active use, ground floor commercial use, and mid-block alley requirements.

Ordinance amending the Planning Code to exempt 100% affordable housing developments from active use, ground floor commercial use, and mid-block alley requirements; expand temporary use authorizations to 100% affordable housing developments that have not submitted a development application; and facilitate the conversion of Residential Care Facilities to 100% affordable housing developments by exempting such adaptive reuse projects from certain residential use and development standards; affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act; making findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1; and making findings of public necessity, convenience, and welfare pursuant to Planning Code, Section 302.

Proposes a change to city law: Changing the the city's zoning/building rules to allow modification and revocation of certain Conditions of Approval for Non-Residential Uses administratively where the applicable zoning no longer requires a Conditional Use authorization, subject to Planning Commission delegation, clarify when enlargement or intensification of a Nonconforming Use does not require a new Conditional Use authorization, and delegate limited authority to the Planning Director to administratively approve requests to modify certain Conditions of Approval imposed through a Conditional Use authorization.

Ordinance amending the Planning Code to allow modification and revocation of certain Conditions of Approval for Non-Residential Uses administratively where the applicable zoning no longer requires a Conditional Use authorization, subject to Planning Commission delegation, clarify when enlargement or intensification of a Nonconforming Use does not require a new Conditional Use authorization, and delegate limited authority to the Planning Director to administratively approve requests to modify certain Conditions of Approval imposed through a Conditional Use authorization; affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act; making findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1; and making public necessity, convenience, and welfare findings under Planning Code, Section 302.

This resolution urges various city departments to assess how they distribute ultra-processed foods and to ensure their practices align with California's Real Food, Healthy Kids Act. It also calls for the Department of Public Health to create a framework for identifying and evaluating these foods for better decision-making in food distribution.

Resolution urging the Sheriff’s Office, the Department of Public Health, the Department of Children, Youth and Their Families, and the Department of Homelessness and Supportive Housing to review their distribution of ultra-processed foods directly and through contractors and to align with the goals of California’s Real Food, Healthy Kids Act; and urging the Department of Public Health to develop a framework for identifying and evaluating ultra-processed foods for the City to use in decisions concerning food distribution and procurement and for reporting purposes.

This resolution urges state officials to change certain laws that restrict San Francisco's ability to protect rent-controlled units and tenants' rights after demolition or redevelopment. It aims to strengthen local efforts to preserve affordable housing in the city.

Resolution urging state officials to amend sections enacted by the passage of the Housing Crisis Act of 2019 or SB 330, including, but not limited to, Government Code, Sections 65941.1, 66300, and 66301, which limited San Francisco’s ability to protect rent controlled units from demolition, weakened tenants’ right of return after demolition or redevelopment, and undermined local Housing Element Objectives to preserve affordable housing.

The ordinance authorizes the City and County of San Francisco to settle lawsuits totaling $1,191,000 filed by several hospitality companies. These lawsuits were related to claims for attorneys' fees and other costs stemming from previous court decisions against the City.

Ordinance authorizing settlement of the lawsuits filed by AGPME Tenant LLC, KPH Management LLC, Mangal Inc., Gajanan, Inc., Engage Hospitality LLC, Engage with SF Hospitality LLC, and Lombard Hospitality LLC against the City and County of San Francisco for $1,191,000; the lawsuits were filed on February 9, 2016, and September 16, 2016, in San Francisco Superior Court, Case Nos. CGC-16-554309, CGC-16-550354, CGC-16-550351, and CGC-16-554304, and California Court of Appeal Case Nos. A160539 and A168328; entitled Gajanan Inc. et al. v. City and County of San Francisco et al.; AGPME Tenant, LLC v. City and County of San Francisco et al.; KPH Management LLC et al. v. City and County of San Francisco et al.; and Mangal Inc. et al. v. City and County of San Francisco et al.; the remaining issues in the lawsuits involve claims for attorneys’ fees on the City’s appeal of the San Francisco Superior Court’s decision against the City on attorneys’ fees, claims for interest on the City’s attorneys’ fees payment, and claims for costs on appeal.

The ordinance authorizes the City and County of San Francisco to settle a lawsuit for $5,845,000 related to claims of elder abuse and violations of patients' rights involving over 700 residents of Laguna Honda Hospital. This lawsuit was filed in March 2020 and has now been resolved with this settlement.

Ordinance authorizing settlement of the lawsuit filed by Tommy O. Johnson, by and through his Attorney-in-Fact Rev. Doris White and John Doe, by and through his conservator Thomas O’Connor, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, against the City and County of San Francisco for $5,845,000; the lawsuit was filed on March 24, 2020, in San Francisco Superior Court, Case No. CPF-20-517064; entitled Tommy O. Johnson, by and through his Attorney-in-Fact Rev. Doris White and John Doe, by and through his conservator Thomas O’Connor, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated v. City and County of San Francisco, et al.; the lawsuit involves claims of elder/dependent adult abuse, invasion of privacy, negligence, and violations of patients’ rights brought by over 700 former and current residents of Laguna Honda Hospital.

This resolution approves an extension and increase in funding for shelter services at Sanctuary Shelter, allowing the grant to continue for an additional two years and raising the total funding to nearly $40.9 million. It also gives the Department of Homelessness and Supportive Housing the authority to make minor adjustments to the agreement as needed.

Resolution approving the third amendment to the grant agreement between Episcopal Community Services and the Department of Homelessness and Supportive Housing (“HSH”) for shelter services at Sanctuary Shelter; extending the grant term by 24 months from June 30, 2026, for a total term of July 1, 2021, through June 30, 2028; increasing the agreement amount by $15,140,870 for a new total amount not to exceed $40,896,141; and authorizing HSH to enter into any amendments or other modifications to the Amendment that do not materially increase the obligations or liabilities, or materially decrease the benefits to the City and are necessary or advisable to effectuate the purposes of the Agreement.

This resolution approves an extension of a grant agreement with Felton Institute for Drop-in Center operations, extending the term by 24 months and increasing the funding by over $7 million. The total grant amount will now be nearly $16.9 million, and it allows for minor amendments to the agreement as needed.

Resolution approving the third amendment to the grant agreement between Felton Institute and the Department of Homelessness and Supportive Housing (“HSH”) for Drop-in Center operations, extending the grant term by 24 months from June 30, 2026, for a total term of October 1, 2022, through June 30, 2028, and increasing the agreement amount by $7,134,976 for a new total amount not to exceed $16,854,149; and authorizing HSH to enter into any amendments or other modifications to the Amendment that do not materially increase the obligations or liabilities, or materially decrease the benefits to the City and are necessary or advisable to effectuate the purposes of the Agreement.

This legislation involves a hearing for people who want to express their support or objections regarding a decision made by Public Works to approve a tentative parcel map for a mixed-use condominium project at 3333 Mission Street and 190 Coleridge Street. The hearing is scheduled due to an appeal filed by Don Lucchesi.

Hearing of persons interested in or objecting to the decision of Public Works, dated November 7, 2025, approving a Tentative Parcel Map for a three-lot vertical subdivision, five residential and 10 commercial mixed-use condominium project at 3333 Mission Street and 190 Coleridge Street, Assessor’s Parcel Block No. 5615, Lot Nos. 099, 100, 101. (District 9) (Appellant: Don Lucchesi) (Filed: November 17, 2025)

This motion approves a subdivision plan for a mixed-use development at 3333 Mission Street and 190 Coleridge Street, which will include five residential units and ten commercial condominiums. It also confirms that the project meets environmental standards and aligns with the city's General Plan and planning policies.

Motion approving the decision of Public Works and approving the Tentative Parcel Map for a three-lot subdivision, five residential and 10 commercial mixed-use condominium project at 3333 Mission Street and 190 Coleridge Street, Assessor’s Parcel Block No. 5615, Lot Nos. 099, 100, 101; and making environmental findings, and findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1.

This motion aimed to disapprove a proposed three-lot subdivision and mixed-use condominium project at 3333 Mission Street and 190 Coleridge Street. The motion was ultimately killed, meaning the project can proceed without this disapproval.

Motion conditionally disapproving the decision of Public Works and disapproving the Tentative Parcel Map for a three-lot subdivision, five residential and 10 commercial mixed-use condominium project at 3333 Mission Street and 190 Coleridge Street, Assessor’s Parcel Block No. 5615, Lot Nos. 099, 100, 101, subject to the Board of Supervisors’ adoption of written findings in support of the disapproval.

This motion aimed to have the Clerk of the Board create findings regarding the Board of Supervisors' decision to reject a proposed subdivision and mixed-use condominium project at 3333 Mission Street and 190 Coleridge Street. The motion has been killed, meaning it will not proceed further.

Motion directing the Clerk of the Board to prepare findings relating to the Board of Supervisors' decision to disapprove the Tentative Parcel Map for a three-lot subdivision, five residential and 10 commercial mixed-use condominium project at 3333 Mission Street and 190 Coleridge Street, Assessor’s Parcel Block No. 5615, Lot Nos. 099, 100, 101.

The ordinance requires property owners to replace any residential units they demolish and provides relocation assistance to affected tenants, especially those with lower incomes. It also establishes stricter conditions for demolition permits and enhances tenant protections against harassment and improper buyout agreements.

Ordinance amending the Planning Code to 1) require property owners seeking to demolish residential units to replace all units that are being demolished; 2) prohibit demolition permits for five years if a tenant vacated a unit in the building to be demolished due to harassment or under an improper buyout agreement, subject to certain conditions; 3) require relocation assistance to affected occupants of units being demolished and to former occupants of those units who vacated due to certain buyout agreements, owner move-ins, pursuant to the Ellis Act, or due to serious and imminent hazards, with additional assistance and protections for lower-income tenants; 4) modify the Planning Code definition of demolition; 5) modify the conditional use criteria that apply to projects to demolish residential units; amending the Administrative Code to 6) require landlords to provide additional relocation assistance to lower-income tenants who are being required to vacate temporarily due to capital improvements or rehabilitation work; 7) update the standards and procedures for hearings related to tenant harassment; 8) require additional disclosures in buyout agreements; 9) require an additional disclosure in notice of intent to withdraw units under the Ellis Act; 10) making various non-substantive changes and clarifications; affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act; making public necessity, convenience, and welfare findings under Planning Code, Section 302; and making findings of consistency with the General Plan and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1.

This motion appoints Sharon Wai Sum Lai and Cynthia Alvarez to the Housing Authority Commission in San Francisco. Their terms will be determined later.

Motion appointing Sharon Wai Sum Lai and Cynthia Alvarez, to the Housing Authority of the City and County of San Francisco Board of Commissioners (Housing Authority Commission), terms to be determined.

This motion schedules a public hearing for January 27, 2026, where the Board of Supervisors will discuss changes to the Redevelopment Plan for the Mission Bay South area, specifically focusing on an affordable housing project on Block 4 East. The meeting will allow community input on these proposed amendments.

Motion scheduling the Board of Supervisors to sit as a Committee of the Whole on January 27, 2026, at 3:00 p.m., to hold a public hearing to consider amendments to the Redevelopment Plan for the Mission Bay South Redevelopment Project in regard to an affordable housing project on Block 4 East.

This motion approves the final map for a mixed-use condominium project with nine residential units and one commercial unit at 2420-2422 3rd Street. It also confirms that the project aligns with the city's General Plan and planning policies.

Motion approving Final Map No. 12424, a nine residential unit and one commercial unit, mixed use condominium project, located at 2420-2422 3rd Street, being a subdivision of Assessor’s Parcel Block No. 4108, Lot No. 003F; and adopting findings pursuant to the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1.

This motion approves a detailed map for developing parts of Treasure Island into up to 41 lots for residential, commercial, and public use, including 1,154 condominiums. It also includes agreements for public improvements and ensures compliance with city planning policies.

Motion approving phased Final Map No. 10347 relating to portions of Treasure Island, the merger and re-subdivision of Final Transfer Map No. 9837, Lot Nos. 1-16 and A-R, resulting in up to 41 lots intended for residential, commercial, open space, and public right-of-way, including up to 1,154 condominiums (1,066 residential condominium units and 88 commercial condominium units), subject to specified conditions; approving a Public Improvement Agreement related to Final Map No. 10347; conditionally accepting offers of improvements; and acknowledging findings pursuant to the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1.

This motion approves the final map for a two-lot subdivision at 3231-3233 16th Street, allowing for a five-unit residential condominium project. It also confirms that the project aligns with the city's General Plan and planning policies.

Motion approving Final Map No. 11676, a two-lot vertical subdivision, lot one being a five-unit residential condominium project located at 3231-3233 16th Street, being a subdivision of Assessor’s Parcel Block No. 3567, Lot No. 042; and adopting findings pursuant to the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1.

This resolution allows the Human Services Agency to receive and use a $268,000 grant from Blue Cross of California for a program aimed at addressing housing and homelessness in San Francisco. The funding will be available from April 1, 2026, to March 31, 2030.

Resolution authorizing the Human Services Agency to accept and expend a grant in the total amount of $268,000 from the Blue Cross of California Partnership Plan, Inc. for participation in the program entitled “Housing and Homelessness Incentive Program Funding - San Francisco” for the period of April 1, 2026, through March 31, 2030.

This resolution allows the Human Services Agency to receive and use a $1,072,000 grant from the San Francisco Health Plan for a program aimed at addressing housing and homelessness from April 1, 2026, to March 31, 2030. The funding is designated for initiatives that support individuals experiencing homelessness in the city.

Resolution authorizing the Human Services Agency to accept and expend a grant in the total amount of $1,072,000 from the San Francisco Health Plan for participation in the program entitled “Housing and Homelessness Incentive Program Funding - San Francisco” for the period of April 1, 2026, through March 31, 2030.

This resolution approves a grant agreement for up to $15,369,361 to support a 100% affordable housing project for low-income and formerly homeless households at specified locations. It allows the Mayor and the Director of the Mayor’s Office of Housing and Community Development to manage and modify the agreement as needed.

Resolution retroactively approving and authorizing the Mayor and the Director of the Mayor’s Office of Housing and Community Development (“MOHCD”) to execute a grant agreement with RSU Associates, L.P. in the amount not to exceed $15,369,361 for a 20-year term to provide operating subsidies for a 100% affordable housing project housing for low-income and formerly homeless households, including transition aged youth, located at 78 Haight Street and 120 Octavia Street; approving the form of and authorizing the execution of the grant agreement with a retroactive commencement date of October 1, 2025; authorizing the Director of MOHCD to enter into any additions, amendments, or other modifications to the grant agreement that do not materially increase the obligations or liabilities of the City or materially decrease the benefits to the City; and authorizing the Director of MOHCD to take actions necessary to implement this Resolution, as defined herein.

This resolution allows the city to issue up to $41.75 million in revenue notes to finance the construction of a 95-unit rental housing development called "967 Mission." It also approves various agreements and authorizes city officials to take necessary actions related to the financing and project implementation.

Resolution authorizing the execution and delivery of a multifamily housing revenue note (tax-exempt) in a principal amount not to exceed $21,750,000 and a multifamily housing revenue note (taxable) in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $20,000,000 for a total not to exceed amount of $41,750,000 for the purpose of providing financing for the construction of a 95-unit multifamily rental housing development known as “967 Mission”; approving the form of and authorizing the execution of a funding loan agreement providing the terms and conditions of the loan from the funding lender identified therein to the City and for the execution and delivery of the notes; approving the form of and authorizing the execution of a borrower loan agreement providing the terms and conditions of the loan from the City to the borrower; approving the form of and authorizing the execution of a regulatory agreement and declaration of restrictive covenants; approving the form of and authorizing the execution of an assignment of deed of trust and loan documents; authorizing the collection of certain fees; approving modifications, changes, and additions to the documents; ratifying and approving any action heretofore taken in connection with the back-to-back loans, the notes, and the project; granting general authority to City officials to take actions necessary to implement this Resolution; and related matters, as defined herein.

This resolution approves a long-term lease for city-owned property at 967 Mission Street to develop a 95-unit affordable housing project for seniors, including units for homeless seniors. It also authorizes financing and loan agreements to support the construction of this project.

Resolution 1) approving and authorizing the Director of Property and the Director of the Mayor’s Office of Housing and Community Development (“MOHCD”) to enter into a Ground Lease for real property owned by the City located at 967 Mission Street (“Property”) with 967 Mission, LP, for a lease term of 75 years and one 24-year option to extend, and an annual base rent of $15,000 (“Ground Lease”) in order to construct a 100% affordable rental housing development consisting of 95-units (including one unrestricted manager’s unit) for senior households, known as 967 Mission, including 40 senior operating subsidy units, 24 local operating subsidy program units reserved for homeless seniors and seniors at risk of homelessness, and five units for referrals from the City’s plus housing list (the “Project”); 2) authorizing the Mayor and the Director of MOHCD to execute loan documents related to a loan to 967 Mission, LP, to provide financing for the development and construction of the Project; 3) approving and authorizing an Amended, Restated and Consolidated Loan Agreement in an amount not to exceed $44,318,000 for a minimum loan term of 57 years with 967 Mission, LP to finance the development and construction of the Project; 4) determining that the less than market rent payable under the Ground Lease will serve a public purpose by providing affordable housing for low-income, senior households in need, in accordance with Section 23.30 of the Administrative Code; 5) adopting findings declaring that the Property is “exempt surplus land” pursuant to the California Surplus Land Act; 6) adopting findings that the Project and proposed transactions are consistent with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1; and 7) authorizing the Director of MOHCD to make certain modifications to such agreements, as defined herein, and take certain actions in furtherance of this Resolution, as defined herein.

This resolution approves a $10.5 million grant for a 95-unit affordable housing project, specifically designed to support extremely low-income seniors. It authorizes the Mayor and housing officials to finalize the grant agreement and take necessary actions for implementation over a 15-year term.

Resolution approving and authorizing the Mayor and the Director of the Mayor’s Office of Housing and Community Development (“MOHCD”) to execute a grant agreement with 967 Mission, LP in the amount of $10,548,907 for a term of 15 years to provide operating subsidies for a 95-unit 100% affordable housing project, with 40 units of housing for extremely low-income seniors; approving the form of and authorizing the execution of the grant agreement; granting general authority to City officials to take actions necessary to implement this Resolution, as defined herein.

This resolution outlines how various city departments will implement strategies to reduce drug overdoses among clients who use drugs. It is currently awaiting action from a committee.

Resolution receiving Overdose Prevention Policies for the Department of Public Health, the Department of Homelessness and Supportive Housing, the Department of Emergency Management, and the Human Services Agency describing how the department and its grantees that provide direct services to clients who use drugs will promote strategies to reduce drug overdoses, submitted as required by Administrative Code, Section 15.17.

This legislation proposes to hold a public hearing to discuss increasing the maximum building height in the Mission Bay South area from 160 feet to 250 feet and allowing more dwelling units for an affordable housing project. It also includes necessary environmental findings and ensures consistency with the city's General Plan and planning policies.

Hearing of the Board of Supervisors sitting as a Committee of the Whole on January 27, 2026, at 3:00 p.m., to hold a public hearing to consider an Ordinance approving amendments to the Redevelopment Plan for the Mission Bay South Redevelopment Project to increase the maximum building height from 160 feet to 250 feet and to increase the number of dwelling units permitted on the northern one-half of Block 4 East (Assessor’s Parcel Block No. 8711, Lot No. 029B) for the development of an affordable housing project; making findings under the California Environmental Quality Act; directing the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors to transmit a copy of the Ordinance upon its enactment to the Successor Agency; and making findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1(b); scheduled pursuant to the Motion in File No. 251221, approved by the Board on December 16, 2025.

The ordinance redefines "Family" in the Planning Code to include any group of people living together without numeric limits on unrelated members or meal-sharing requirements. It also classifies small Residential Care Facilities as Residential Uses and clarifies the Zoning Administrator's authority to enforce regulations.

Ordinance amending the Planning Code to define a “Family” as a “Household,” eliminate numeric limits on unrelated family members and requirements that family members share meals, classify Residential Care Facilities that serve six or fewer persons as Residential Uses, include certain groups of six or fewer people and associated operators as a “Household”; clarify the Zoning Administrator’s enforcement authority to administratively subpoena documents; affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act; making findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1; and making findings of public necessity, convenience, and welfare pursuant to Planning Code, Section 302.

This hearing aims to review how well state and local laws against riding electric and gas-powered scooters on sidewalks are enforced and to assess the effects of any enforcement gaps on pedestrian safety. It will also gather information on current enforcement practices, citation data, and the coordination between relevant departments regarding the increasing number of privately owned scooters on sidewalks.

Hearing to examine the enforcement of state and local laws prohibiting the riding of electric and gas-powered scooters on sidewalks, and to evaluate how inadequate enforcement impacts pedestrian safety; requesting departments to report on current enforcement practices, citation data, coordination between departments, and the growing prevalence of privately owned scooters being ridden on sidewalks; and requesting the Municipal Transportation Agency and the Police Department to report.

This ordinance updates various city planning elements to support the Family Housing Zoning Program, which includes changes to building heights, density, and design guidelines. It also amends the Local Coastal Program to align with these housing initiatives and requires the Planning Director to send the ordinance to the Coastal Commission.

Ordinance amending the General Plan to revise the Urban Design Element, Commerce and Industry Element, Transportation Element, Balboa Park Station Area Plan, Glen Park Community Plan, Market and Octavia Area Plan, Northeastern Waterfront Plan, Van Ness Avenue Area Plan, Western SoMa (South of Market) Area Plan, Western Shoreline Area Plan, Downtown Area Plan, and Land Use Index, to implement the Family Housing Zoning Program, including the Housing Choice-San Francisco Program, by adjusting guidelines regarding building heights, density, design, and other matters; amending the City’s Local Coastal Program to implement the Housing Choice-San Francisco Program and other associated changes in the City’s Coastal Zone, and directing the Planning Director to transmit the Ordinance to the Coastal Commission upon enactment; affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act; making findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1; and adopting findings of public necessity, convenience, and welfare under Planning Code, Section 340.

The ordinance changes zoning classifications for various properties in San Francisco to support the Family Zoning Plan, allowing for more residential and commercial development in specific areas. It also updates height limits and designations for properties in the Coastal Zone and includes findings related to environmental quality and city planning policies.

Ordinance amending the Zoning Map to implement the Family Zoning Plan by: amending the Zoning Use District Maps to: 1) reclassify certain properties currently zoned as various types of Residential to Residential Transit Oriented - Commercial (RTO-C); 2) reclassify properties currently zoned Residential Transit Oriented (RTO) to Residential Transit Oriented - 1 (RTO-1); 3) reclassify certain properties from Residential districts other than RTO to RTO-1; 4) reclassify certain properties currently zoned Neighborhood Commercial (NC) or Public (P) to Community Business (C-2); and 5) reclassify certain properties from Public to Mixed-Use or Neighborhood Commercial Districts; amending the Height and Bulk Map to: 1) reclassify properties in the Family Zoning Plan to R-4 Height and Bulk District, except for properties with structures designated as landmarks or contributors to historic districts pursuant to Article 10; 2) change the height limits on certain lots in the R-4 Height and Bulk District; and 3) designating various parcels to be included in the Non-Contiguous San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency Sites Special Use District (SFMTA SUD); amending the Local Coastal Program to: 1) reclassify all properties in the Coastal Zone to R-4 Height and Bulk District; 2) reclassify certain properties to RTO-C and Neighborhood Commercial District; 3) designate one parcel as part of the SFMTA SUD; and 4) directing the Planning Director to transmit the Ordinance to the Coastal Commission upon enactment; affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act; making findings of public necessity, convenience, and welfare under Planning Code, Section 302; making findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1; and making findings under the City’s Local Coastal Program and the California Coastal Act of 1976.

The ordinance creates the Housing Choice-San Francisco Program to encourage housing development and modifies zoning regulations to increase building height and density in certain neighborhoods. It also includes provisions for parking requirements, business relocation, and protections for historic buildings, among other changes.

Ordinance amending the Planning Code to: 1) create the Housing Choice-San Francisco Program to incent housing development through a local bonus program and by adopting a Housing Sustainability District, 2) modify height and bulk limits to provide for additional capacity in well-resourced neighborhoods, and to allow additional height and bulk for projects using the local bonus program, 3) require only buildings taller than 85 feet in certain Districts to reduce ground level wind currents, 4) make conforming changes to the RH (Residential, House), RM (Residential, Mixed), and RC (Residential-Commercial) District zoning tables to reflect the changes to density controls, and parking requirements made in this Ordinance, 5) create the RTO-C (Residential Transit Oriented-Commercial) District, 6) implement the Metropolitan Transportation Commission’s Transit-Oriented Communities Policy by making changes to parking requirements, minimum residential densities, and minimum office intensities, and requiring maximum dwelling unit sizes, 7) revise off-street parking and curb cut obligations citywide, 8) create the Non-contiguous San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency Sites Special Use District, 9) permit businesses displaced by new construction to relocate without a conditional use authorization and waive development impact fees for those businesses, 10) make technical amendments to the Code to implement the above changes, 11) make conforming changes to zoning tables in various Districts, including the Neighborhood Commercial District and Mixed Use Districts, 12) prohibit Lot mergers on Lots with Historic Buildings, subject to certain preservation obligations, and 13) reduce usable open space and bicycle parking requirements for senior housing; amending the Business and Tax Regulations Code regarding the Board of Appeals’ review of permits in the Housing Choice Program Housing Sustainability District; also, amending the Local Coastal Program to implement the Housing Choice-San Francisco Program and other associated changes in the City’s Coastal Zone, and directing the Planning Director to transmit the Ordinance to the Coastal Commission upon enactment; affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act; making findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1; and making public necessity, convenience, and welfare findings under Planning Code, Section 302.

This resolution allows San Francisco to enter into an agreement to receive over $39 million in funding for the acquisition and rehabilitation of a property at 1035 Van Ness to provide permanent supportive housing for veterans. It also commits the City to provide additional matching funds and operating subsidies for at least five years.

Resolution authorizing the City and County of San Francisco (“City”), through the Department of Homelessness and Supportive Housing (“HSH”), to 1) execute a Standard Agreement with the California Department of Housing and Community Development (“HCD”) and co-applicants Swords to Plowshares: Veterans Rights Organization and 1035Vets LLC for a total award not to exceed $39,044,030 under the Homekey+ Program, including up to $36,044,030 disbursed by HCD as a grant to 1035Vets LLC for acquisition of real property located at 1035 Van Ness for permanent supportive housing for veterans (the “Property”) and support of operating costs, and up to $3,000,000 disbursed by HCD as a grant to the City for rehabilitation of the Property; 2) accept and expend anticipated revenue from the City’s portion of Homekey+ grant funds in an amount up to $3,000,000 for the rehabilitation of the Property; 3) approving and authorizing the City to commit up to $8,000,000 in required matching funds for rehabilitation of the Property and a minimum of five years of operating subsidy, additionally the City committed up to 15 years of operating subsidies through the City’s Local Operating Subsidy Program (“LOSP”) subject to budget appropriations; 4) authorizing the City to assume any joint and several liability for expenditure of the Homekey+ grant under the Standard Agreement; 5) adopting the Planning Department’s findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1; and 6) authorizing HSH to enter into any additions, amendments, or other modifications to the Standard Agreement and the Homekey+ Documents that do not materially increase the obligations or liabilities of the City or materially decrease the benefits to the City.

This resolution approves a loan of $8 million and a grant of $3 million to 1035Vets LLC to convert a property at 1035 Van Ness Avenue into 124 supportive housing units for veterans experiencing homelessness. It also allows the Mayor and the Director of the Mayor's Office of Housing and Community Development to manage the agreement and make necessary adjustments.

Resolution approving and authorizing a Loan and Grant Agreement in an amount not to exceed $11,000,000 consisting of a loan in the amount of $8,000,000 for a minimum term of 55 years and a grant in the amount of $3,000,000 with 1035Vets LLC for the purpose of rehabilitating real property located at 1035 Van Ness Avenue (“1035 Van Ness”) into 124 units of permanent supportive housing for veterans exiting homelessness under the Homekey+ Program administered by the California Department of Housing and Community Development (the “Project”); adopting findings that the Project and proposed transactions are consistent with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1; authorizing the Mayor and the Director of Mayor’s Office of Housing and Community Development (“MOHCD”) to execute the Loan and Grant Agreement, and make certain modifications to such agreements, as defined herein, and take certain actions in furtherance of this Resolution, as defined herein; and authorizing the Director of MOHCD to enter into any additions, amendments, or other modifications to the Loan and Grant Agreement that do not materially increase the obligations or liabilities to the City and are necessary to effectuate the purposes of this Resolution.

This resolution allows San Francisco to enter into an agreement to receive over $17 million in funding for the rehabilitation of a property at 835 Turk Street to create permanent supportive housing for the homeless. It also commits the City to provide additional matching funds and operating subsidies for at least five years.

Resolution authorizing the City and County of San Francisco (“City”), through the Department of Homelessness and Supportive Housing (“HSH”), to 1) execute a Standard Agreement with the California Department of Housing and Community Development (“HCD”) and co-applicants 835 Turk LLC and Five Keys Schools and Programs for a total award not to exceed $17,291,506 under the Homekey+ Program, including up to $3,561,599 disbursed by HCD as a grant to 835 Turk LLC for support of operating costs and up to $13,729,907 disbursed by HCD as a grant to the City for the rehabilitation and associated relocation costs for the real property located at 835 Turk Street for permanent supportive housing (the “Property”); 2) retroactively accept and expend anticipated revenue from the City’s portion of Homekey+ grant funds in an amount up to $13,729,907 to support the rehabilitation and associated relocation costs for the Property for costs incurred from March 5, 2024, through HCD’s capital grant expenditure deadline; 3) approving and authorizing the City to commit approximately $16,270,093 in required matching funds for rehabilitation of the Property and a minimum of five years of operating subsidies, additionally the City has committed up to 15 years of operating subsidies through the City’s Local Operating Subsidy Program subject to budget appropriations; 4) authorizing the City to assume any joint and several liability for expenditure of the Homekey+ grant under the Standard Agreement; 5) adopting the Planning Department’s findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1; and 6) authorizing HSH to enter into any additions, amendments, or other modifications to the Standard Agreement and the Homekey+ Documents that do not materially increase the obligations or liabilities of the City or materially decrease the benefits to the City.

The resolution approves a 55-year ground lease for a property at 835 Turk Street to develop a 106-unit permanent supportive housing project for very low-income households, with a total rent of $1. It also authorizes a loan of up to $12.9 million and a grant of up to $13.7 million to finance the project, aiming to provide affordable housing and meet public needs.

Resolution 1) approving and authorizing the Director of Property and the Department of Homelessness and Supportive Housing (“HSH”) to enter into a Ground Lease for real property owned by the City located at 835 Turk Street (“Property”) with 835 Turk LLC for a lease term of 55 years and total rent not to exceed $1 (“Ground Lease”) in order to rehabilitate and operate a 100% permanent supportive housing, 106-unit multifamily rental housing development affordable to very low-income households, plus one manager’s unit on the Property (the “Project”); 2) approving and authorizing the Mayor and the Director of the Mayor's Office of Housing and Community Development ("MOHCD") to enter into a Loan and Grant Agreement with 835 Turk LLC to finance the development and rehabilitation of the Project with a) a loan in an amount not to exceed $12,922,000 for a minimum loan term of 55 years and b) a grant in an amount not to exceed $13,729,907 from California Department of Housing and Community Development Homekey+ funds; 3) adopting findings declaring that the Property is "exempt surplus land" pursuant to the California Surplus Lands Act; 4) determining that the less than market rent payable under the Ground Lease will serve a public purpose by providing affordable housing for low-income households in need, in accordance with Section 23.30 of the Administrative Code; 5) adopting findings that the Project and proposed transactions are consistent with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1(b); and 6) authorizing the Director of Property, the Director of MOHCD, and/or the Executive Director of HSH, or their designees, to execute and make certain modifications to such agreements, as defined herein, and take certain actions in furtherance of this Resolution, as defined herein.

This ordinance repeals the existing 2022 Building Code and replaces it with the new 2025 Building Code, which includes updates from the 2025 California Building Code and Residential Code, tailored for San Francisco. It will take effect on January 1, 2026, and the Clerk will send the necessary documents to the California Building Standards Commission.

Ordinance repealing the 2022 Building Code in its entirety and enacting a 2025 Building Code consisting of the 2025 California Building Code and the 2025 California Residential Code, as amended by San Francisco; adopting environmental findings and findings of local conditions under the California Health and Safety Code; providing for an operative date of January 1, 2026; and directing the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors to forward the legislation to the California Building Standards Commission as required by State law.

This legislation is a hearing focused on the conditions for women in local jails, addressing their safety, available services, and the oversight of jail staffing and misconduct. It requests reports from various city departments to evaluate these issues and improve the situation for women in custody.

Hearing to discuss the conditions for women in custody at local jails, including personal safety, programming, services and resources available; examine the oversight of hiring and assignment process for jail staffing, complaint process for women in custody, and disciplinary policies and procedures for Sheriff’s deputies who commit misconduct; and requesting the Sheriff’s Department, Mayor’s Office of Housing and Community Development, Department of Children, Youth, and Their Families, Human Rights Commission, Mayor’s Office of Victim’s Rights, Department of Police Accountability, and Office of Sexual Harassment and Assault Response and Prevention to report.

This ordinance updates the Planning Code by clarifying language and prohibiting massage establishments and sole practitioners from operating as accessory uses in residential areas. It also confirms compliance with environmental regulations and aligns with the city's General Plan and priority policies.

Ordinance amending the Planning Code to make various clarifying and typographical changes, and prohibit massage establishments and massage sole practitioner uses as accessory uses to residential uses; affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act; making findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1; and making findings of public necessity, convenience, and welfare pursuant to Planning Code, Section 302.

The ordinance allows movie theaters that also serve food to host various entertainment activities and sell alcohol on-site. It also exempts certain theaters in the Upper Fillmore area from size limits for non-residential uses when selling wine and beer.

Ordinance amending the Planning Code to authorize Movie Theaters that also operate as Bona Fide Eating Places to offer entertainment, cultural, artistic, dramatic, musical, or leisure activities, performances or exhibitions, and permit on-site wine, beer, and/or liquor, and make conforming changes in the Planning Code definitions of Bar and Bona Fide Eating Place uses; permitting certain Movie Theaters in the Upper Fillmore Neighborhood Commercial District to sell wine and/or beer without being subject to non-residential use size limits otherwise applicable in the District; affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act; making findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1; and making findings of public necessity, convenience, and welfare pursuant to Planning Code, Section 302.

This motion approves the final map for a 20-unit commercial condominium project at 1301-1341 Evans Avenue. It also confirms that the project aligns with the city's General Plan and planning policies.

Motion approving Final Map No. 10857, a 20-Commercial Unit Condominium Project, located at 1301-1341 Evans Avenue, being a subdivision of Assessor’s Parcel Block No. 5237, Lot No. 037; and adopting findings pursuant to the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1.

The ordinance allows for taller buildings and more housing units in the Mission Bay South area to support an affordable housing project. It also includes environmental findings and ensures consistency with city planning policies.

Ordinance approving amendments to the Redevelopment Plan for the Mission Bay South Redevelopment Project to increase the maximum building height from 160 feet to 250 feet and to increase the number of dwelling units permitted on the northern one-half of Block 4 East (Assessor’s Parcel Block No. 8711, Lot No. 029B) for the development of an affordable housing project; making findings under the California Environmental Quality Act; directing the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors to transmit a copy of this Ordinance upon its enactment to the Successor Agency; and making findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1.

This motion seeks to remove Peter Cohen from the Inclusionary Housing Technical Advisory Committee. It is currently awaiting action from the committee.

Motion removing Peter Cohen from the Inclusionary Housing Technical Advisory Committee.

The ordinance authorizes the City of San Francisco to settle lawsuits with Microsoft for $6.5 million related to tax refunds. The lawsuits concern gross receipts and homelessness gross receipts taxes filed in 2021 and 2025.

Ordinance authorizing settlement of the lawsuits filed by Microsoft Corporation and Subsidiaries against the City and County of San Francisco for $6,500,000; the lawsuits were filed on February 26, 2021, April 23, 2021, and June 3, 2025, in San Francisco Superior Court, Case Nos. CGC-21-590032, CGC-21-591004, and CGC-25-625880; entitled Microsoft Corporation and Subsidiaries. v. City and County of San Francisco et al.; the lawsuits involve a refund of gross receipts and homelessness gross receipts taxes; other material terms of the settlement relate to Microsoft Corporation’s filing position with respect to City taxes.

The hearing aims to investigate why various city agencies are focusing homelessness services in District 10, treating it as a containment area. It requests a detailed report on the locations, capacities, selection criteria, and community outreach related to these services in that district.

Hearing to examine why the Mayor's Office, San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency (SFMTA), Department of Homelessness and Supportive Housing (HSH), Department of Emergency Management (DEM), and the Port continue to concentrate shelters, safe sleeping sites, vehicle triage operations, emergency response facilities, and other homelessness-related services in District 10 in ways that treat the Bayview as a containment zone; requesting departments to present a full citywide accounting of all homeless service facilities in District 10, including the location, capacity, criteria used to select those sites, and if any community outreach was conducted prior to establishing the site; and requesting the Mayor's Office, SFMTA, HSH, DEM and the Port to report.

The ordinance requires property owners to replace any residential units they demolish and provides relocation assistance to affected tenants, including those who faced harassment or were forced to vacate. It also updates definitions and criteria related to demolitions and tenant protections, ensuring additional support for lower-income tenants during temporary relocations for repairs.

Ordinance amending the Planning Code to 1) require property owners seeking to demolish residential units to replace all units that are being demolished; 2) require relocation assistance to affected occupants of those units and to former occupants who vacated due to harassment, improper buyout agreements, owner move-ins, pursuant to the Ellis Act, or due to serious and imminent hazards, with additional assistance and protections for lower-income tenants; 3) modify the Planning Code definition of demolition; 4) modify the conditional use criteria that apply to projects to demolish residential units; amending the Administrative Code to 5) require landlords to provide additional relocation assistance to lower-income tenants who are being required to vacate temporarily due to capital improvements or rehabilitation work; 6) update the standards and procedures for hearings related to tenant harassment; 7) require additional disclosures in buyout agreements; 8) require an additional disclosure in notice of intent to withdraw units under the Ellis Act; 9) making various non-substantive changes and clarifications; affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act; making public necessity, convenience, and welfare findings under Planning Code, Section 302; and making findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1.

This ordinance creates the Chula-Abbey Early Residential Historic District in San Francisco, adding protections for its historical, architectural, and aesthetic landmarks. It also affirms the Planning Department's environmental review and aligns with the city's General Plan and priority policies.

Ordinance amending the Planning Code to add a new Appendix P to Article 10, Preservation of Historical, Architectural, and Aesthetic Landmarks, to create the Chula-Abbey Early Residential Historic District; affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act; and making public necessity, convenience, and welfare findings under Planning Code, Section 302, and findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1.

This ordinance establishes the Alert Alley Early Residential Historic District to protect its historical, architectural, and aesthetic significance. It also confirms compliance with environmental regulations and aligns with the city's planning priorities.

Ordinance amending the Planning Code to add a new Appendix Q to Article 10, Preservation of Historical, Architectural, and Aesthetic Landmarks, to create the Alert Alley Early Residential Historic District; affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act; and making public necessity, convenience, and welfare findings under Planning Code, Section 302, and findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1.

The ordinance creates a program to provide financial support, such as grants and loans, to small businesses affected by construction related to the city's residential rezoning efforts. It also establishes a fund to manage these resources and assigns oversight to specific city offices.

Ordinance amending the Administrative Code to create the Small Business Rezoning Construction Relief Program (“Program”) to provide financial support, including grants and loans, to businesses impacted by construction relating to the City residential rezoning program adopted in 2025-2026; establishing the Small Business Rezoning Construction Relief Fund (“Fund”) to receive monies for the Program; designating the Office of Small Business and Office of Economic and Workforce Development to administer the Fund and the Program and promulgate rules and regulations in furtherance of the Program; and amending the Business and Tax Regulations Code to allow taxpayers to designate a portion of their gross receipts taxes for deposit in the Fund.

This resolution approves a settlement of $435,014.22 to Ript Labs, Inc. for claims related to a refund of gross receipts and homelessness gross receipts taxes filed against the City. The claims were submitted on July 22, 2025, and the resolution has been passed.

Resolution approving the settlement of the unlitigated claims filed by Ript Labs, Inc. against the City and County of San Francisco for $435,014.22; the claims were filed on July 22, 2025; the claims involve a refund of gross receipts and homelessness gross receipts taxes.

This resolution extends a contract with Catholic Charities for HIV health services rental subsidies by five years and increases the funding by over $7 million, totaling approximately $13.4 million. It also allows the Department of Public Health to make minor adjustments to the agreement as needed.

Resolution approving Amendment No. 1 to the agreement between City, acting by and through, the Department of Public Health (DPH), and Catholic Charities, to provide HIV health services rental subsidies services, to extend the term by five years from June 30, 2026, for a total term of July 1, 2021, through June 30, 2031, and to increase the amount by $7,317,206 for a total not to exceed amount of $13,426,414; and to authorize DPH to enter into amendments or modifications to the agreement that do not materially increase the obligations or liabilities to the City and are necessary to effectuate the purposes of the agreement or this Resolution.

This resolution allows the Department of Homelessness and Supportive Housing to seek donations from private organizations to expand temporary shelter and services for homeless individuals, bypassing certain restrictions in the Behested Payment Ordinance. It has been officially passed.

Resolution authorizing the Department of Homelessness and Supportive Housing’s Executive Director, Chief Deputies, Deputy Directors and Program Directors to solicit donations from various private entities and organizations to support the expansion of temporary shelter and other homeless services to support people experiencing homelessness, notwithstanding the Behested Payment Ordinance.

This ordinance changes the approval process for Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) in San Francisco by eliminating appeals to the Board of Appeals and increasing size limits for certain new detached ADUs on single-family lots. It also confirms compliance with state law and local planning policies.

Ordinance amending the Planning Code and Business and Tax Regulations Code to modify the City’s State-mandated Accessory Dwelling Unit (“ADU”) approval process and conform to changes to State ADU law, including by removing any appeal to the Board of Appeals, and increasing size limits for certain detached, new construction ADUs on a lot containing a single-family dwelling; affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act; making findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1; and making findings of public necessity, convenience, and welfare pursuant to Planning Code, Section 302.

This ordinance allocates $3.5 million from the General Reserve to the Mayor’s Office of Housing and Community Development to enhance immigration legal defense and community response services for immigrants in the 2025-2026 fiscal year. The goal is to improve access to these essential services for the immigrant community.

Ordinance appropriating $3,500,000 from the General Reserve to the Mayor’s Office of Housing and Community Development to expand access to existing coordinated services for immigration legal defense and community response services to the immigrant community in Fiscal Year (FY) 2025-2026.

The proposed initiative ordinance aimed to increase taxes on ridesharing and ride-hailing services, adjust certain tax exemptions, and modify the executive pay ratio calculation for tax purposes, starting January 1, 2027. However, this hearing has been withdrawn and will not proceed to the voters for consideration.

Hearing to consider the proposed Initiative Ordinance submitted by four or more Supervisors to the voters for the November 3, 2026, Election, entitled "Ordinance amending the Business and Tax Regulations Code, beginning January 1, 2027, to: 1) increase the gross receipts tax (Article 12-A-1) rates for ridesharing and ride hailing services, 2) make the administrative office taxes inapplicable to providers of those ridesharing and ride hailing services for purposes of the Article 12-A-1 tax, the homelessness gross receipts tax (Article 28), and the overpaid executive gross receipts tax (Article 33), 3) increase the Article 33 tax rates, and 4) change the method for determining the executive pay ratio for purposes of calculating the Article 33 tax; and increasing the City's appropriations limit by the amounts collected under Article 12-A-1 for ridesharing and ride hailing services and by the amounts collected under Article 33, for four years from November 3, 2026." Comment (Economic Impact; No Economic Analysis Report)

This motion approves the final map for an eight-lot vertical subdivision project at 1155 Market Street. It also confirms that the project aligns with the city's General Plan and planning policies.

Motion approving Final Map No. 9806, an eight-lot vertical subdivision project, located at 1155 Market Street, being a subdivision of Assessor’s Parcel Block No. 3702, Lot No. 820; and adopting findings pursuant to the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1.

The ordinance authorizes the City and County of San Francisco to settle a lawsuit with General Motors for $71,125,000 regarding overpaid taxes and related penalties. This settlement resolves claims made by General Motors in a case filed in November 2022.

Ordinance authorizing settlement of the lawsuit filed by General Motors Company against the City and County of San Francisco for $71,125,000; the lawsuit was filed on November 21, 2022, in San Francisco Superior Court, Case No. CGC-22-602951; entitled General Motors Company v. City and County of San Francisco; the lawsuit involves a claim for refund of gross receipts taxes, homelessness gross receipts taxes, overpaid executive gross receipts taxes, penalties, and interest; other material terms of the settlement relate to General Motors Company’s filing position with respect to City taxes.

This resolution extends a contract with A&A Health Services, Inc. for rehabilitative board and care residential services for an additional three years and increases the funding by $22.7 million, bringing the total to nearly $32.7 million. It also allows the Department of Public Health to make minor adjustments to the agreement as needed.

Resolution approving Amendment No. 1 to the agreement between the City and County of San Francisco, acting by and through, the Department of Public Health (DPH), and A&A Health Services, Inc., to provide rehabilitative board and care residential services, to extend the term by three years from June 30, 2026, for a total term of July 1, 2024, through June 30, 2029, and to increase the amount by $22,722,200 for a total not to exceed amount of $32,654,875; and to authorize DPH to enter into amendments or modifications to the agreement that do not materially increase the obligations or liabilities to the City and are necessary to effectuate the purposes of the agreement or this Resolution.

This resolution allows the San Francisco International Airport to reduce the minimum annual payments and percentage rent for certain food and beverage concession tenants. It also changes how the annual minimum guarantees are adjusted for all food and beverage leases at the airport.

Resolution approving the Food and Beverage Minimum Annual Guarantee and Pre-Security Rent Reduction Program for Food & Beverage Concession Tenants allowing the San Francisco International Airport to enter into lease amendments to lower the minimum annual guarantees for 18 of 69 food & beverage leases, lower the percentage rent structure for seven pre-security leases, and alter the annual minimum annual guarantee adjustment methodology for all food and beverage leases.

The ordinance aimed to create a program to encourage housing development in San Francisco by modifying zoning laws, adjusting height limits, and changing parking requirements. It also included provisions for displaced businesses and made various technical amendments to the Planning Code, but it has been killed and will not be enacted.

Ordinance amending the Planning Code to: 1) create the Housing Choice-San Francisco Program to incent housing development through a local bonus program and by adopting a Housing Sustainability District, 2) modify height and bulk limits to provide for additional capacity in well-resourced neighborhoods, and to allow additional height and bulk for projects using the local bonus program, 3) require only buildings taller than 85 feet in certain Districts to reduce ground level wind currents, 4) make conforming changes to the RH (Residential, House), RM (Residential, Mixed), and RC (Residential-Commercial) District zoning tables to reflect the changes to density controls, and parking requirements made in this ordinance, 5) create the RTO-C (Residential Transit Oriented-Commercial) District, 6) implement the Metropolitan Transportation Commission’s Transit-Oriented Communities Policy by making changes to parking requirements, minimum residential densities, and minimum office intensities, and requiring maximum dwelling unit sizes, 7) revise off-street parking and curb cut obligations citywide, 8) create the Non-contiguous San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency Sites Special Use District, 9) permit businesses displaced by new construction to relocate without a conditional use authorization and waive development impact fees for those businesses, 10) make technical amendments to the Code to implement the above changes, 11) make conforming changes to zoning tables in various Districts, including the Neighborhood Commercial District and Mixed Use Districts, prohibit Lot mergers on Lots with Category A historic resources, subject to certain preservation obligations, and 13) reduce usable open space and bicycle parking requirements for senior housing; amending the Business and Tax Regulations Code regarding the Board of Appeals’ review of permits in the Housing Choice Program Housing Sustainability District; also, amending the Local Coastal Program to implement the Housing Choice-San Francisco Program and other associated changes in the City’s Coastal Zone, and directing the Planning Director to transmit the ordinance to the Coastal Commission upon enactment; affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act; making findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1; and making public necessity, convenience, and welfare findings under Planning Code, Section 302.